Chain of custody is the documented, chronological record proving a urine specimen was collected, sealed, and handled only by authorized people from the moment of collection through final reporting. Break that chain, and even a chemically accurate positive result can be thrown out or challenged in court, arbitration, or a DOT compliance review. For most federally regulated collections, that documentation happens on one specific document: the Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form.

TL;DR:

  • The chain of custody must document every person, transfer, and location handling the specimen, or the result can be challenged or invalidated in court or arbitration.
  • The Federal CCF form’s five copies are essential, with Copy 1 accompanying the specimen into testing and all copies retained for record-keeping; mismatched specimen IDs are a common reason for processing issues.
  • Proper collection procedures include verifying identity, maintaining line-of-sight custody, temperature checks within four minutes, and sealing the specimen in the donor’s presence, all documented accurately.
  • Internal laboratory custody transfers and retesting protocols, including split specimens, are critical for legal defensibility, especially when results are contested or disputed.
  • Most errors that lead to invalid results stem from clerical issues like signature omissions or specimen ID mismatches, not analytical failures, highlighting the importance of meticulous documentation.
Total Tox
Keep Drug Testing Audit Ready
Total Tox provides expedited DOT and workplace testing with MRO-reviewed results and audit-ready documentation for compliant collections.
Visit Total Tox

Table of Contents

What Chain of Custody Covers and When It’s Required

Chain of custody tracks every person and location that touches a specimen, along with the date, time, and purpose of each transfer. It’s a chronological documentation process built on one simple legal premise: if you can’t prove who had the specimen and when, you can’t prove it wasn’t tampered with. Courts, arbitrators, and federal agencies treat an undocumented gap the same way they’d treat evidence that vanished from a locked cabinet overnight.

The framework exists because federal agencies built one around it. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Department of Transportation (DOT) each enforce pieces of the same chain. HHS certifies the laboratories through the National Laboratory Certification Program (NLCP), SAMHSA writes the collection procedures and reviewer guidance, and DOT applies all of it to safety-sensitive transportation employees under 49 CFR Part 40.

You’ll encounter mandatory chain of custody in several recurring situations:

  • Federal workplace testing for any employer covered by a federal drug-free workplace mandate, including many government contractors.
  • DOT-regulated testing for CDL holders, pilots, rail workers, and other safety-sensitive transportation roles.
  • Legal and custody disputes, where a family court or opposing counsel may challenge a result’s admissibility on procedural grounds alone.
  • Immigration medical exams, where USCIS-designated civil surgeons rely on properly documented results as part of Form I-693.
  • High-stakes employer testing, even outside federal mandates, when a company wants results that will hold up if an employee grieves a termination.

Chain of custody applies to more than one specimen type. Hair follicle and oral fluid (saliva) testing both use documented custody procedures, and urine remains the most commonly used specimen for regulated and workplace testing because it has the deepest body of federal guidance behind it. That’s why this article, and most compliance programs, treat urine collection as the baseline case. Everything from the paperwork to the physical collection steps below assumes a urine specimen unless stated otherwise.

The Federal CCF: Five Copies, Five Jobs

The Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form, universally shortened to the Federal CCF, is the OMB-approved document that anchors every federally regulated urine and oral fluid collection. DOT collections in particular cannot substitute a private-lab form, a state form, or an expired version of the CCF. Part 40 is explicit that only the current Federal CCF is acceptable for a DOT-regulated collection, and a collector who signs the form before the collection even occurs has committed a procedural error serious enough to void the test.

The form comes in a five-part carbonless set, and each copy has a specific destination:

Copy Recipient Purpose
Copy 1 Laboratory Travels sealed with the specimen; documents chain of custody through testing
Copy 2 Medical Review Officer Supports MRO review and verification of results
Copy 3 Collector Retained at the collection site for its own records
Copy 4 Employer Confirms the collection occurred and provides basic details
Copy 5 Donor Given to the employee at the time of collection

Copy 1 is the one that matters most for legal defensibility. It physically accompanies the specimen into the shipping bag and stays with it through receipt, testing, and reporting, which is why Step 4 on that copy exists specifically to log every custody transfer from collection site to laboratory.

Pro Tip: If you’re reviewing a CCF after the fact, check that the specimen ID number on Copy 1 matches the number on the specimen bottle label exactly, digit for digit. A single transposed number is one of the most common reasons labs report a specimen as unable to be processed.

The form itself walks through five numbered steps, and knowing which ones belong to whom prevents a lot of confusion:

  • Step 1 is completed by the collector before collection: donor and employer information, the reason for the test, and which drug panel applies.
  • Step 2 is where the donor prints and signs their name, certifying the specimen is theirs.
  • Step 3 covers the collector’s certification of specimen temperature, volume, and any observed irregularities.
  • Step 4 documents the chain of custody itself, including any transfer of custody before the specimen leaves collector control.
  • Step 5 is completed later by laboratory personnel to certify receipt and testing.

DOT collector guidance is specific about sequencing: complete Steps 1, 2, and 3 at collection, leave Step 5 for the lab, and make sure Step 4 is filled in accurately before the specimen ever leaves your hands. Get that order wrong, and you’ve created a discrepancy an opposing attorney or an MRO reviewer will flag immediately.

Electronic versions of the form, known as the ECCF, are gaining ground at larger collection networks. An ECCF still has to mirror the OMB-approved fields exactly, and most collection sites, including smaller walk-in clinics, still run the paper version because it requires no software integration and produces the same legally recognized carbon copies on the spot.

Step-by-Step Urine Collection and Chain-of-Custody Process

A compliant urine collection follows a specific sequence, and skipping steps or doing them out of order is exactly how a clean specimen ends up canceled on a technicality. Here’s how a properly run collection actually unfolds, from the moment the donor walks in to the moment the specimen leaves the building.

Before the donor produces a specimen:

  1. Verify photo ID. The collector confirms the donor’s identity against a government-issued photo ID or positive identification by the employer representative present.
  2. Check the paperwork. The collector confirms the CCF is preprinted correctly with employer name, MRO contact information, and the reason for the test, and that it’s the current, unexpired Federal CCF version.
  3. Secure the collection area. Under SAMHSA’s collection site standards, the restroom or collection area must be restricted to authorized personnel only during the collection window, with water sources controlled or disabled where required.
  4. Have the donor wash hands and remove any outer garments or items that could be used to adulterate the specimen, per site protocol.

During the collection itself:

  1. Give clear instructions. The donor enters the collection area alone unless an observed or monitored collection is specifically required (common in return-to-duty or follow-up testing situations).
  2. Maintain line-of-sight custody. Once the donor produces the specimen, the collector must ensure no unauthorized person has an opportunity to handle it before it’s sealed. If line-of-sight can’t be maintained continuously, custody has to be transferred to another authorized person or placed in documented secure storage, with the handoff logged at the moment it happens.
  3. Check the temperature immediately. The collector reads the specimen’s temperature strip within 4 minutes of receiving it, and it needs to fall between 90°F and 100°F. A temperature outside that range is a validity flag, and the collector documents the reading and any follow-up action taken, since an out-of-range temperature requires specific, objective remarks rather than a vague note.

After the specimen is produced:

  1. Pour and split in the donor’s presence. The collector pours the specimen into the specimen bottle(s) with the donor watching the entire time.
  2. Seal the bottle. Tamper-evident seals go over the bottle cap, and the donor initials the seal to confirm it’s their specimen.
  3. Complete Step 2. The donor prints and signs their name on the CCF, certifying the specimen came from them.
  4. Collector signs and dates. The collector completes and signs Step 3, certifying the collection process, then completes Step 4 to document custody up to the point of shipment.

Packaging and shipment:

  1. Bag it correctly. The sealed specimen bottle goes into a leak-resistant plastic bag along with Copy 1 of the CCF, then into the outer shipping container.
  2. Ship promptly. DOT collector guidance requires collectors to ship the sealed specimen and CCF to an HHS-certified laboratory within 24 hours or the next business day, whichever applies to the site’s protocol.

Recordkeeping that follows:

Copy 3 stays at the collection site, Copy 4 goes to the employer, and Copy 5 goes to the donor before they leave. Retention periods vary by program, but most compliant sites keep collector-copy records for at least two years, and DOT-regulated employers often retain longer under separate recordkeeping rules. The paperwork trail is just as important as the specimen itself; a lab can run a flawless analysis, but if the collector’s copies don’t match what shipped with the specimen, that mismatch becomes a legitimate challenge point later.

Laboratory Handling, MRO Review, and What the Results Mean

Chain of custody doesn’t end at the shipping dock. Once a specimen reaches an HHS-certified laboratory, sometimes called an Instrumented Initial Test Facility (IITF) for the initial screening stage, lab personnel document receipt, inspect the seal for signs of tampering, and annotate Copy 1 of the CCF to continue the custody record internally. Inside the lab, custody transfers to instruments, refrigerated storage, and confirmatory testing stations get logged in the lab’s own internal system, whether that’s a linear log, a task-list format, or what’s sometimes called a “Z-type” internal chain. Missed internal transfers are one of the most common findings during laboratory audits, which is part of why NLCP certification exists in the first place.

If the initial screen comes back non-negative, federal protocol requires a confirmatory test using a different, more specific method before anything gets reported as positive. This is also where the split specimen matters. Most regulated urine collections split the void into two bottles at the time of collection, labeled A and B. If the donor disputes a confirmed positive result, they have the right to request that the B specimen be sent to a second HHS-certified lab for independent retesting, typically within 72 hours of being notified of the result.

Paired split specimen bottles prepared for retesting

The specimen and its paperwork then land with the Medical Review Officer, a licensed physician trained specifically to interpret laboratory results in a legal and medical context. The MRO’s job isn’t to rubber-stamp the lab report. They review the CCF for completeness, check the laboratory’s own certification, and, if a result is non-negative, contact the donor directly to ask whether a legitimate medical explanation, like a valid prescription, accounts for it.

From there, an MRO can take one of several actions:

  • Verify positive if no legitimate medical explanation exists.
  • Verify negative or report the result as reported.
  • Cancel the test if there’s a fatal procedural flaw in the collection or documentation.
  • Request additional information from the donor, collector, or laboratory before making a final determination.

The result box on a returned CCF can carry several different labels beyond a simple positive or negative:

Result What it means
Negative No target substances detected above the cutoff
Verified positive Confirmed positive with no legitimate medical explanation
Dilute Specimen creatinine and specific gravity fall below normal, suggesting excess fluid intake
Substituted Specimen chemistry is inconsistent with human urine
Adulterated A foreign substance was added to mask results
Invalid/canceled A procedural or testing flaw prevents a valid interpretation

Each of those outcomes triggers different next steps for the employer and the donor, and none of them are final until the MRO signs off.

Common Chain-of-Custody Errors and How to Prevent Them

The chemistry behind a drug test is rarely the weak point. Practitioners consistently point to clerical error on the CCF as the leading cause of a canceled or invalid result, not a lab instrument malfunction. That’s an uncomfortable fact for anyone who assumes a bad result means a bad specimen. Often it means a bad form.

The errors that show up again and again include:

  • Specimen ID mismatches, where the number on the bottle label doesn’t exactly match the number recorded on the CCF.
  • Missing signatures, particularly a donor who forgets to sign Step 2 or a collector who forgets Step 3.
  • Generic remarks, where a collector writes something vague like “specimen looked odd” instead of an objective, specific observation. MROs place real weight on specificity in the remarks field, and a generic entry often triggers a cancellation or a request for more information rather than a clean pass.
  • Broken line-of-sight custody, where the specimen sits unattended, even briefly, without a documented transfer to another authorized person.
  • Collection area security lapses, such as an unauthorized visitor entering the restroom or water access that wasn’t properly disabled.

Pro Tip: Document custody transfers the moment they happen, not at the end of your shift from memory. A chain of custody expert puts it plainly: failing to document an event is treated the same as that event never happening at all, even if you know exactly what happened.

When an error surfaces, the fix depends on timing. If a collector catches a mistake during the collection itself, a contemporaneous memorandum for the record, sometimes shortened to an MFR, documenting exactly what happened and when can preserve the specimen’s validity. If the error is fatal, a missing donor signature with no way to correct it, for instance, the only remedy is often a re-collection. Neither option is pleasant for an employer trying to fill a safety-sensitive position quickly, which is exactly why training and periodic internal audits of collector paperwork matter more than most compliance programs budget for. A ten-minute spot check of recent CCFs catches the same mistakes an MRO would catch, just before they cost anyone a re-collection.

Practical Checklist and Where to Get the Official Forms

A working collection checklist boils down to three phases, and most compliance failures trace back to skipping one small step within them.

Before the collection:

  • Confirm the current, unexpired Federal CCF is on hand.
  • Verify donor identity against photo ID.
  • Secure the collection area and restrict water access as required.

During the collection:

  • Maintain continuous line-of-sight custody or document a secure transfer.
  • Read specimen temperature within 4 minutes and confirm it falls in the 90°F to 100°F range.
  • Have the donor initial the seal and complete Step 2 of the CCF.

After the collection:

  • Complete Steps 3 and 4 accurately before the specimen leaves your custody.
  • Package the specimen and Copy 1 together and ship to an HHS-certified lab within 24 hours or the next business day.
  • Distribute Copies 3, 4, and 5 to the collection site, employer, and donor respectively.

For the actual documents, go straight to the source rather than a third-party template. The Federal CCF itself is available as a PDF proof directly from SAMHSA, and the agency’s Urine Collection Handbook walks through supply requirements and packing procedures in far more detail than any summary article can cover. Sites running an electronic CCF still need to match those same OMB-approved fields exactly, and most collection sites keep both a digital record and a physical carbon copy on file to satisfy whatever retention standard applies to their program.

How Total Tox Prepares Audit-Ready Chain-of-Custody Collections

Compliance on paper and compliance in practice are two different things, and the gap between them usually shows up the first time a result gets challenged. Every collection starts with the CCF preprinted with employer, MRO, and test-reason information before the donor ever walks into the room, which removes one of the most common points where clerical mistakes creep in.

Seals go on in the donor’s presence, temperature checks happen within the required window, and every copy of the CCF gets distributed the way federal guidance requires, so nothing gets assembled after the fact or reconstructed from memory. That matters most in the situations where a second chance isn’t realistic: DOT-regulated testing where a re-collection means a driver sits out of service, immigration medical exams tied to a filing deadline, or a legal or custody matter where an opposing party is actively looking for a procedural flaw to exploit.

Because Total Tox runs walk-in collections with results reviewed by a Medical Review Officer, employers and individuals typically get MRO-reviewed results within about 24 hours, without sacrificing the documentation trail that makes those results defensible later. The services page covers the full range of testing Total Tox performs, from DOT urine collections to hair follicle and oral fluid testing, all handled with the same audit-ready paperwork standard.

Using a professional clinic for a regulated or high-stakes test doesn’t just save time. It reduces the odds that a technical paperwork gap forces a costly re-collection weeks after the fact.

Privacy and Confidentiality During Chain of Custody

Chain of custody and donor privacy aren’t in conflict, but they do require the collector to balance two competing needs at once: verifying the specimen is genuinely the donor’s, while intruding as little as possible on personal privacy.

Standard collections are unobserved. The donor produces the specimen alone in a private space, and the collector waits outside the immediate area, only maintaining custody once the specimen is handed over. Observed collections, where a same-gender collector directly watches the void, are reserved for specific circumstances, such as a return-to-duty test following a prior violation, and federal rules narrowly define when an observed collection is actually required.

Donor medical information disclosed to the MRO during result verification is protected. If a donor explains a non-negative result with a valid prescription, that medical detail stays with the MRO and typically isn’t disclosed to the employer beyond the final verified determination. The employer sees the result; they don’t see the underlying medical conversation that produced it.

Collection sites also have to control who has physical access to the collection area itself. Visitors and non-essential staff shouldn’t be present during the collection window, and specimens, once sealed, should be stored securely rather than left in an open, accessible area before shipment. Confidentiality failures here aren’t just embarrassing. They’re the kind of detail a defense attorney or grievance arbitrator will ask about directly if a result ever gets contested.

What Happens Legally When Chain of Custody Breaks

A broken chain of custody doesn’t automatically mean a drug test is thrown out, but it hands the donor’s side a concrete, specific argument instead of a vague one. In arbitration, litigation, or a family court custody dispute, an attorney doesn’t need to prove the specimen was actually tampered with. They only need to show the documentation left a gap where tampering was possible.

That’s a meaningfully lower bar than most people assume, and it’s why MROs cancel results over paperwork issues that have nothing to do with the actual chemistry. A missing signature, an unexplained gap in custody transfer records, or a specimen ID that doesn’t match its paperwork can each be enough to get a positive result excluded, regardless of what the confirmatory testing actually found.

The practical fallout varies by context. An employer relying on a canceled DOT test may have to send the employee for a re-collection, delaying a return to safety-sensitive duties. A family court litigant challenging a result on chain-of-custody grounds may force a re-test, sometimes with a court-ordered observed collection to close the argument permanently. In a workers’ compensation or wrongful termination claim, a successful chain-of-custody challenge can shift the entire burden of proof back onto the employer.

None of this means chain-of-custody challenges always succeed. Courts and arbitrators generally distinguish between a genuine, prejudicial gap and a trivial clerical slip that doesn’t actually undermine confidence in the result. But the distinction only favors the employer or lab when the documentation is thorough enough to make that argument in the first place.

Documenting Chain of Custody So It Holds Up in Court

Admissibility comes down to one question: can you reconstruct, using only the paperwork, exactly who had the specimen at every point from collection to final report? If the answer requires anyone’s memory to fill a gap, the documentation has already failed.

That means every custody transfer needs to be logged at the moment it happens, not reconstructed later from a collector’s recollection of a typical shift. As one chain-of-custody analysis put it, failing to document a transfer is legally treated as though it never occurred, even when everyone involved knows perfectly well what happened.

Objective, specific language matters more than most collectors realize. “Specimen temperature read 88°F at 3:42 PM, donor provided second void within window” holds up far better under cross-examination than “temperature was a little low.” The first statement is falsifiable and specific. The second invites exactly the kind of doubt a challenge is built on.

Retaining every copy of the CCF, along with any internal laboratory custody logs, for the full retention period that applies to the program in question closes the loop. A collector, employer, or laboratory that can produce a complete, uninterrupted paper trail on request, months or years after the fact, is in a fundamentally stronger position than one that can only produce partial records or relies on staff memory to fill gaps a court will not accept as evidence.

Chain of Custody for Hair and Oral Fluid Specimens

Urine gets the deepest regulatory treatment because it’s the specimen type federal programs have relied on longest, but hair follicle and oral fluid (saliva) testing follow the same core custody principle: document who had the specimen, when, and why, at every step.

The physical collection differs meaningfully between specimen types. Hair collection involves cutting a sample close to the scalp in the donor’s presence, and the custody concern shifts from temperature checks and line-of-sight voiding to properly sealing and labeling the hair sample immediately after cutting, since there’s no equivalent to a temperature strip for hair. Oral fluid collection is faster and inherently observed, since the collector watches the donor use the collection device directly, which actually reduces one of urine testing’s biggest custody risks: the unobserved void where substitution or adulteration is possible.

Neither specimen type currently uses the same standardized Federal CCF form structure in the way federally regulated urine and oral fluid collections do, though oral fluid guidance under Part 40 continues to expand. For readers comparing specimen types for a specific testing need, the practical differences in detection windows and collection experience between hair and urine testing matter as much as the custody mechanics do.

Retesting and Appeals After a Positive Result

A verified positive result isn’t necessarily the end of the process, and donors have specific, defined rights to challenge it rather than just an informal complaint process.

The split specimen is the primary mechanism. Since most regulated collections divide the urine void into two bottles at collection, a donor disputing a confirmed positive can request that the B specimen be sent to a second HHS-certified laboratory for independent testing, generally within 72 hours of being notified by the MRO. If the second lab doesn’t confirm the same result, the original test is effectively canceled.

Before that stage, the MRO’s own verification interview is the first real checkpoint. Every non-negative result triggers a direct conversation between the MRO and the donor, giving the donor a documented chance to provide a legitimate medical explanation, such as a valid prescription, before the result is ever verified as positive.

Beyond the split specimen, a donor or their representative can challenge the result on procedural grounds, essentially arguing that a chain-of-custody or documentation gap makes the result unreliable regardless of what either lab found. This route doesn’t retest the specimen. It attacks whether the result should count at all, and it’s the same argument that plays out in arbitration and litigation described earlier. Employers who keep complete, contemporaneous documentation are far better positioned to withstand this kind of challenge than those relying on incomplete paperwork assembled after a dispute arises.

The Medical Review Officer’s Role in Detail

The MRO is the last line of defense between a laboratory result and a final, actionable determination, and the role carries specific legal weight that a lab technician’s report alone doesn’t have.

Every MRO is a licensed physician with specific training in interpreting drug test results in an employment and legal context. Their first job is procedural: reviewing the CCF for completeness, confirming the laboratory holds current HHS certification, and checking that nothing in the paperwork trail suggests a fatal collection error.

If a specimen comes back non-negative, the MRO is required to contact the donor directly, in a confidential conversation, to ask whether a legitimate medical explanation accounts for the result. A valid, currently prescribed medication explaining an amphetamine or opioid positive, for example, can lead the MRO to report the result as negative rather than positive, even though the lab detected the substance.

From there, the MRO’s guidance manual outlines a defined set of possible actions: verify the result as positive, verify it as negative, cancel the test entirely due to a procedural flaw, or request additional information before making any final call. That determination, not the raw laboratory printout, is what actually gets reported to the employer. It’s the step that turns a chemical finding into a legally defensible outcome, and it’s the reason a rushed or poorly trained MRO review can undo an otherwise flawless collection.

Why Documentation Often Matters More Than the Chemistry

The instinct in this industry is to focus on the science: what cutoff level triggered a positive, what confirmatory method the lab used, whether a prescription explains a result. That instinct is understandable, and it’s also incomplete. In practice, the collections that get challenged, delayed, or thrown out almost never fail because the chemistry was wrong. They fail because a signature was missing, a specimen ID didn’t match, or a custody transfer never got written down.

That’s not a comfortable thing to admit if you’ve built a testing program assuming the lab is the risk. The lab is rarely the risk. The paperwork is. A perfectly run mass spectrometry confirmation means nothing to an arbitrator if the collector forgot to complete Step 4, and no amount of analytical precision fixes a specimen ID typo after the fact.

Rigorous documentation isn’t a bureaucratic tax on the process. It’s what makes a result something you can actually stand behind months later, when memories have faded and the only thing left is the paper trail.

— Total Tox

Fast, Audit-Ready Urine Testing With Total Tox

This clinic offers a walk-in alternative to scheduling a lab appointment days out and hoping the paperwork holds up later. Every DOT and workplace collection runs with the CCF preprinted before the donor arrives, seals applied in the donor’s presence, and copies distributed the way federal guidance requires, so the documentation is defensible from the first signature.

Total Tox

Many collections take under 15 minutes on a walk-in basis, and results come back MRO-reviewed, typically within 24 hours. That turnaround matters for a driver who needs to stay in service, an employer that wants to avoid a re-collection delay, or an individual working against an immigration filing deadline. The full service lineup covers urine, saliva, and hair follicle testing, DOT and employee physicals, immigration medical exams, and fingerprinting, all with the same audit-ready paperwork standard behind them.

If you need a compliant collection scheduled without the wait, reach out to Total Tox to set up a walk-in or appointment-based test today.

FAQ

What Is Chain of Custody in Drug Testing?

Chain of custody is the documented record of everyone who handled a specimen, from collection through final lab reporting, including the date and purpose of each transfer. It exists so a positive or negative result can be trusted as accurate and untampered, and a gap in that record can get a result canceled or challenged regardless of what the lab actually found.

What Tests Require Chain of Custody?

Federally regulated workplace testing, DOT-regulated safety-sensitive positions, immigration medical exams, and most legal or custody disputes all require documented chain of custody, typically using the Federal CCF. Many employers also require it for high-stakes pre-employment or post-incident testing even when not federally mandated.

What Is the Chain of Custody Process for Urine Drug Tests?

The process runs from ID verification and collection area security, through the donor producing the specimen under line-of-sight custody, to temperature checking within 4 minutes, sealing, labeling, and finally shipping to an HHS-certified lab within 24 hours or the next business day. Every step gets logged on the CCF, and Copy 1 travels with the specimen the entire way. A clinic like Total Tox handles this entire sequence during a single walk-in visit.

What Type of Drug Test Is Used in Custody Cases?

Urine testing is the most common specimen type used in legal and family custody disputes, largely because it has the most established chain-of-custody procedures and the widest network of HHS-certified laboratories. Hair follicle testing sometimes appears when a longer detection window matters to the case, but urine remains the default for most court-ordered testing.

How Much Does Total Tox Charge for a Chain of Custody Drug Test?

Pricing for urine drug testing and other services is available directly on the Total Tox services page rather than listed here, since it can vary by test type and program requirements. Contact the clinic directly for current rates on your specific testing need.